<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Bitcoin on 0x1 ZeroINK</title><link>https://blog.zjackie.ink/tags/bitcoin/</link><description>Recent content in Bitcoin on 0x1 ZeroINK</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><copyright>Copyright © 2026 Jackie · Content licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0</copyright><lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2026 18:57:21 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.zjackie.ink/tags/bitcoin/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Bitcoin Signatures, Disentangled: ECDSA, Schnorr, Taproot, and SIGHASH</title><link>https://blog.zjackie.ink/share/bitcoin-signature-schemes/</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2026 17:30:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://blog.zjackie.ink/share/bitcoin-signature-schemes/</guid><description>Bitcoin signatures split cleanly into three layers: the algorithm (ECDSA vs Schnorr), the locking script (P2PK, P2PKH, P2SH, SegWit, Taproot), and the SIGHASH commitment. Here is a layer-by-layer comparison of security, fees, and privacy, plus three approaches to multisig and a practical checklist.</description></item></channel></rss>