<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>签名方式 on 0x1 ZeroINK</title><link>https://blog.zjackie.ink/zh/tags/%E7%AD%BE%E5%90%8D%E6%96%B9%E5%BC%8F/</link><description>Recent content in 签名方式 on 0x1 ZeroINK</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>zh-cn</language><copyright>Copyright © 2026 Jackie · Content licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0</copyright><lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2026 18:57:21 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.zjackie.ink/zh/tags/%E7%AD%BE%E5%90%8D%E6%96%B9%E5%BC%8F/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>比特币签名机制拆解：ECDSA、Schnorr、Taproot 与 SIGHASH 详解</title><link>https://blog.zjackie.ink/zh/share/bitcoin-signature-schemes/</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2026 17:30:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://blog.zjackie.ink/zh/share/bitcoin-signature-schemes/</guid><description>把比特币签名拆成三个相对独立的层次：签名算法（ECDSA vs Schnorr）、锁定脚本（P2PK、P2PKH、P2SH、SegWit、Taproot）、SIGHASH 授权范围，逐层对比安全、费用与隐私，再比较三种多签实现，最后给出选型建议与安全清单。</description></item></channel></rss>